In other happenings, I completed my first half marathon today. It was 95 degrees out. I may have almost passed out but damn did it feel good in the end running through the streets of New York.

And, for the most exciting news, (that I’ve already announced but want to put on here) I have a new job! I start at Attention tomorrow as a Director for the Consumer group. I’m beyond excited. Check out the first blog post on the Attention blog here and continue to check it out for more content from me and my awesome colleagues.

“And if all else fails, there is plan B. My contingency plan is to open a falafel stand. There’s always a market for that.”

David if you need a backup chef or a girl to hold out free samples on the street I’m your girl. Although honestly, I immediately thought to give this new falafel stand a Twitter account. So yea, I don’t see this digital stuff going anywhere yet.

Read the full article here from AdAge about why the ad industry won’t be doing that well in the second half of 2009. Good thing that PR has an optimistic view about them.

On the other side of the bar there is a girl with a few friends wearing a leotard over her jeans. Not an uber fashionista, I’m not one to usually gawk at an outfit but she was also dancing around like crazy and making a bit of a small scene. The entire table couldn’t stop staring at her and her unusual antics dancing around the bar. I immediately tried to snap another photo to share it. Why? WHY NOT.

Posting photos of your friends is OK and most of mine expect it now. When I take a picture on my phone I usually get the “is that going on your blog?” question. Sometimes it does, sometimes most of the time it doesn’t. Obviously some friends will say “Don’t tag me in that!” I do the same. But with strangers, I don’t offer them the opportunity to tell me to not post it and that’s kind of bad because honestly, I don’t want people posting me without my knowing.(Note-I don’t think people would. Don’t think I’m tooting my own horn here) In fact, my posting that photo of the girl (I didn’t) could have ended up crossing blog paths with someone else I know, causing an uncomfortable situation and so on.

So, where’s the line?

An article in yesterday’s New York Times about banning photos and tweets at certain bars and restaurants made sense to me. No one wants to go to dinner and have to worry about getting their photo taken by an unknown because they like your shoes or your bag, or if you’re lucky enough to be joined by a famous dinner date. You go to dinner to enjoy the meal and the company.

But, while that is a strong view of mine, I also like hearing about celebrity sightings at local stops. Example: A friend sat next to Matthew Broderick at a coffee shop a few weeks ago and my instant reaction was “Why didn’t you take a picture?!” Sure, the picture would have been of the back of his head or maybe a blurry action shot, but because of the current paparazzi state of the web, my instant reaction was to get proof and I wanted to see. I’ll admit I enjoyed the days when Gawker Stalker was really popular and I keep an eye on OMGICU. I also understand it’s a scary world for celebrities with stalkers and etc…

With the easy click of a button on a phone, the sense of annoyance of the paparazzi for celebrities also now applies to the normal person. As the article says, “On Facebook, “You have movie star issues, and you’re just a person,” she said.” It’s true. People take photos EVERYWHERE. Even when going on a recent vacation I asked my friend to not tag some of the photos and keep them private. It’s the normal person’s version of “No pictures please.”

What do you think? Do you agree with the banning of photos being taken in the bars or should we all just accept that our lives are now in a fishbowl and we need to deal with it?

I do the same thing and know others that do it too. This blog I use for one type of content and the other places on the web for others. Out of the top four places I put content on, here they are:

Social Cocktails: This is my blog. I use it for more professional thoughts about social media/PR/internet/tech etc… Sure, I’ll stray away sometimes but I try and keep it professional here. (Note this blog is moving to WordPress shortly. Goodbye Blogger. You’ve been great but I like WordPress better.)

Tumblr: As I say on the sidebar, “This is where I dump all of the fun stuff from the Internet.” It’s true. I post songs, random photos of my walking through the city, funny quotes…you name it. It’s a place to dump the crazy stuff we all find.

Facebook: I’m still trying to figure this one out. I’ve imported Twitter and Tumblr to both and hate it. I guess I use it to post photos, but not all photos because I don’t want every picture of myself from nights out on the Internet. I use it as a stalking mechanism. I’m not going to deny it and come on, neither should you. I use Facebook to keep an eye on what people are up to. Who got married. Who has a kid. Who got fat. If you haven’t done ONE of these things I’d be shocked. I’m just being honest here! I also use it to get some content from the posted items, but I’m really using it to keep up with friends I don’t see on a regular basis.

Twitter: This one is interesting. I’d like to say I’m completely professional on this, but I’m not. And I don’t think it’s a bad thing. I’m myself. I’m a mix of my professional life and my personal life. I don’t tweet about my dating life or real personal issues, but I do put my personality out there. Plus some cool links. I also share where I am on Foursquare if I want to and some Yelp reviews. So be it.

What about you? Do you use different platforms for different types of content or do you keep one presence across all?

I get the same feeling when I think about the conversation around the number of Twitter followers people have. Imagine if I walked up to someone and in my introduction said “Hi! I’m Kristin Maverick and I have 2,189 Twitter followers!” I would get CRAZY looks!

I think it used to matter. People cared about numbers as a benchmark to how influential they were within the network. Thousands of people “listening” meant that they were “interested” in the important 140 characters that were sent out on a daily basis.

Now? I think it’s changed. When Twitter opened up and celebs became really active on it, more followers started coming my way. I don’t even talk with HALF of them. Heck, 3/4 of them. I took a look this morning at some of my followers. A TON are spam. Some are PR related. (I get that as I’m tagged with PR messages) Some are bots that pick up on key words and instant follow. (Example: I tweeted about Smoothie King this morning and now I’m being followed by @smoothieweb—COME. ON.) The number just doesn’t matter to me. I value the 463 people I follow and how most of them follow me back. I enjoy that conversation. I don’t want to use Twitter as a way to publish my content. People can do that, sure, but don’t go boasting about numbers here. Not when 1,000 of these “followers” are in fact computer bots.

Numbers are numbers but if you’re not interacting with the right people in a smart matter, what’s the point? Quality over quantity. I’d rather people I don’t talk with stop following me than follow me. I want to look through the ones that follow me that can offer some interesting conversation.

What do you think?

The press conference is becoming obsolete for two basic reasons. The media has become more distributed, fragmented. The news cycle has changed. The people that spread word-of-mouth often cannot or do not attend these events, and the news is invariably already being discussed by the time of the press conference.

Rachel Roy (client) proved this point through a one-hour Twitter press conference, which cost $1 (Dina on our team wanted a Poland Springs water), and effectively reached both top-down and bottom-up media.

It is time to change the tool set.

But now, with Twitter especially, news (and especially BAD NEWS) gets spread around to a point of over exposure almost making the news sound catastrophic.

For example, the latest in celebrity deaths was extremely overwhelming. Farrah Fawcett. Michael Jackson. Billie Mays. Each announcement alone was a shocker in its own right, but when multiple people in your online stream are constantly posting, commenting, tweeting—it makes it even bigger because the news continually repeats right in front of you.

No longer are you able to back away from the news. It follows you everywhere. People are writing about the same things as part of a new news cycle across social media. This continuous repeating of the news makes small things bigger than usual and more important than it really is.

Great example: Yesterday, Tumblr went down for about 30 minutes. You go to Tumblr, it’s down. Fine. I won’t be able to check it out but I can move on with my life and get back to work. You then go and check Twitter and EVERYONE is writing about how Tumblr is down! Alone, it’s not really a big deal but together with a critical mass of content about the same thing: IT’S INSANE.

What do you think? Does social media make things bigger than they really are because of the opportunity to spread it and repeat it?

But now, with Twitter especially, news (and especially BAD NEWS) gets spread around to a point of over exposure almost making the news sound catastrophic.

For example, the latest in celebrity deaths was extremely overwhelming. Farrah Fawcett. Michael Jackson. Billie Mays. Each announcement alone was a shocker in its own right, but when multiple people in your online stream are constantly posting, commenting, tweeting—it makes it even bigger because the news continually repeats right in front of you.

No longer are you able to back away from the news. It follows you everywhere. People are writing about the same things as part of a new news cycle across social media. This continuous repeating of the news makes small things bigger than usual and more important than it really is.

Great example: Yesterday, Tumblr went down for about 30 minutes. You go to Tumblr, it’s down. Fine. I won’t be able to check it out but I can move on with my life and get back to work. You then go and check Twitter and EVERYONE is writing about how Tumblr is down! Alone, it’s not really a big deal but together with a critical mass of content about the same thing: IT’S INSANE.

What do you think? Does social media make things bigger than they really are because of the opportunity to spread it and repeat it?